|
|
Post by speedfreak on Aug 12, 2006 1:40:41 GMT -5
just wondering if anyone has seen this yet and if so is it any good or would i be wasting my money
|
|
|
|
Post by Pyroburner69 on Aug 12, 2006 1:43:57 GMT -5
havent seen it but it looks like a serious horror movie that so cheesy that its funny. is it even out yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by speedfreak on Aug 12, 2006 1:47:45 GMT -5
In Australia in a week or two i think as i saw the ad for it a couple of nights ago
|
|
|
|
Post by Pyroburner69 on Aug 12, 2006 1:54:42 GMT -5
well there is a preview for it and the theam song out on the net you may want to check out unless you already have
|
|
|
|
Post by TheCloudOfSmoke on Aug 12, 2006 9:24:14 GMT -5
It looks like a really dumb movie to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by astrogordon on Aug 12, 2006 10:15:37 GMT -5
^yeah I don't like it either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pyroburner69 on Aug 12, 2006 13:49:02 GMT -5
i think it looks stupiud but people will see it just to make fun of it. so i think its going to make a lot of money... sadly
|
|
|
|
Post by Gamesoul Master on Aug 13, 2006 2:35:10 GMT -5
Ugh... the very concept behind the movie almost makes me sick. Simply because of how horrible ideas are becoming these days for movies. I will *never* watch this movie. I can make fun of it from a distance.
|
|
ZeXr0
Junior Member
Posts: 77
|
Post by ZeXr0 on Aug 13, 2006 9:50:16 GMT -5
Well I read an article on that movie, and it seems to be a "Serie B" movie. It is said, the kind of movie you watch a saturday afternoon with friend and that you just enjoy. Something like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pyroburner69 on Aug 19, 2006 21:02:58 GMT -5
the way its been hidden from reviewers reminds me of ultraviolet... anyone see that movie... I dont think i need to say anything else on this. oh and it just came out the past friday here at least
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 21, 2006 12:01:36 GMT -5
Just waiting for the sequel, Bears on a Submarine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gamesoul Master on Aug 21, 2006 12:04:30 GMT -5
I actually rather liked Ultraviolet. The only complaint I had about it was that the fight scenes became a bit too repetitive after a while...
|
|
|
|
Post by astrogordon on Aug 31, 2006 16:29:41 GMT -5
I've just read in this website (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0370032/trivia) that the ultraviolet film that we saw wasn't the one the director wanted, the studio edited and changed many things in the final release =( does anyone know if this is true?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2006 15:38:05 GMT -5
Well all in all studios can only edit as much as there is material to cut from. Besides, this is true in most Hollywood films in general, producers have too much power over artistic matters. And then we will later see a director's cut because of this. Of course, it's all about money. What better way to make dough then to sell the same film twice.
|
|
